Skip to content

ATRIP 38th Annual Congress
August 25 – 28, 2019
Nashville, Tennessee

PROGRAMME AND AGENDA

Dates: 25–28 August 2019 President: Prof. Daniel Gervais
Focus: ‘Recreating Copyright Law, Redesigning Design Law, Resourcing Trademark Law, and Reinventing Patent Law’ Programme: Download (PDF-1) | Download (PDF-2) | Download (PDF-3)
Host: Vanderbilt University Links: Archive | #ATRIP2019

WELCOME FROM ATRIP PRESIDENT

Dear ATRIP Members and Congress attendees,

The theme of our Congress this year is Recreating Copyright Law, Redesigning Design Law, Resourcing Trademark Law, and Reinventing Patent Law.

This theme will allow us to explore ideas to reform IP law but with a focus on the interface between a core of primary international IP (rights in copyright, trademark , design and patent law that have been part of treaties and national laws for many decades)andsecondary(orperipheral)rightsaddedtothecore. Insteadofreforming copyright law, for example, rights against circumvention, removal or alteration of Rights Management Information (RMI) and, in the EU, a sui generis right in databases were added. In the field of trademarks, courts and legislators have added new doctrines to traditional confusion-based tests, such as dilution. Patents and designs now have adjuncts such as the right in computer chips and rights in clinical data (data exclusivity).

The Nashville Congress will discuss both the consequences of changing primary IP rights and whether adding secondary rights to the core of primary rights is a good idea, and if so when and how.

I am very much looking forward to welcoming all of you to Nashville in August. Nashville is a booming city, known not just for its incredible music offerings but increasingly also for its art and food, as you will discover.

With very best wishes,
Prof. Daniel Gervais, PhD, MAE
President, ATRIP, 2017-2019

PHOTOS FROM THE EVENT

ATRIP CONGRESS2019

HIGHLIGHTS

Read the Full Program.

Day 1, Monday 26 August

Session 1. Setting the Stage

Chair: Ruth Okediji 

Technological Inequality

Rochelle Dreyfuss 

Incoherence in US and EU International IP Policy

Susy Frankel 

Intellectual Property Primary and Secondary Rights in International Law

Roberto Garza Barbosa 

Re-setting the Relationship Between Trademark and Unfair Competition Law

Graeme Dinwoodie 

Session 2. Copyright: Big Ideas for Reform

Chair: Niklas Bruun 

Changing the Copyright Conversation: The Problem of Proliferating Rights

Carys Craig 

Moving towards a New Copyright Bargain

 Rebecca Giblin 

(Re)-Creating Copyright Law in the Light of the Fundamental Right to Free Artistic Expression

 Christophe Geiger 

The Place of the Open Movement of Copyright Reforms

Faith Amatika 

Reimagining Copyright Educational Exceptions

Arpan Banerjee & Lida Ayoubi

Copyright: The Case for Abolition

Glynn Lunney 

Session 3A (parallel). IP, Land & TK

Chair: Sang Jo Jong 

Patent Disclosure Reforms and the Role of Traditional Knowledge Databases

Evana Wright 

Rights to do and Rights to Prevent? New Approaches to Rights Overlap Across Intellectual Property, Information Control and Oil and Gas

Abbe Brown 

Sui Generis Protection of Plant Varieties: Implications for Redefining the Norms of Patent Protection

Uchenna Felicia Ugwu 

The Impact of Sui Generis Rights for Indigenous Knowledge and Culture over Primary IP Rights

Natalie Stoianoff 

Making Intellectual Property Law Works for Africa’s Agricultural Sector

 Tigist Gebrehiwot 

Session 3B. Geographical Indications in Focus

 Chair: Christian LeStanc 

Local Places in Global Spaces: Struggles over Geographical Indications and Suggestions for Reforms

Titilayo Adebola 

Rebreeding Geographical Indications Beyond Agriculture: Of ‘Genotype’ and ‘Phenotype’ in Territorial Products

Bernardo Calabrese 

What about Adding New Rights to the Lisbon System and Making it in Charge of the (TRIPS) Special Register for Wines and Spirits?

Suelen Carls 

Čigota – the First Registered Geographical Indication of Origin for Services in the World

Mario Lukinovic 

Brand New IP: ‘Country Name Designation’ – From France with Love

Nathalie Corthésy 

Session 3C. Patent Dilemmas

 Chair: Jens Schovsbo 

Judging the Overlaps between Patents and Plant Breeders’ Rights

Jeremy DeBeer 

Effects of Fast-tracking Patent Examination Policy on Green Technology Innovation

Shan Liu 

Thinking (again) Beyond TRIPS Agreement about Reshaping the Patent Term: with (some) Empirical Evidence

 Milton Lucídio Leão Barcellos 

Interpretation of Int’l Agreements Regarding Primary IP Norms in The Practice of The WTO – A Tool for Reinventing Patent Law?

 Maciej Barczewski 

Broccoli, Tomatoes, and Peppers; Palatable and Patentable? Examining the interpretation of Article 53(b) EPC at the European Patent Office

Karen Walsh 

The Reasonable Application of Restitution in the Patent Litigations: Convergence and Conflict between Patent Infringement and Unj. Enri

Chung-Lun Shen 

Session 4. Patents: Big Ideas for Reform

Chair: Peter Yu 

Creating Gender-Neutral Patent Law?

Jessica Lai 

Does the rise of corporate patent ownership necessitate a reinvention of patent law?

Janice Denoncourt 

Why Harmonize? The Counter-Case of Second- Tier Patent Rights

 Daniel Cahoy & Lynda Oswald 

Customising Patent Law for Biomedical Innovation: towards a Patent Duty Regime

Phoebe Li 

Fault and Patent Infringement

Rafał Sikorski 

Ethical’ Use: A Missed Regulatory Opportunity?

Aisling McMahon

Day 2,

Tuesday 27 August.

Session 5. Trademarks: Big Ideas for Reform

Chair: Judge Kent Jordan 

Protectable Trademark Subject Matter in Common Law Countries and the Problem with Flexibility

Lisa P. Ramsey 

Building a Robust Trademark Fair Use System in China

Haochen Sun 

Reinventing Trademark Law for Its Old Purpose: The Case against the Protection of Non-Traditional Trademarks

Irene Calboli 

How States Can Plainly Package Human Rights to Balance Expanding Trade Mark Owner Rights

 Genevieve Wilkinson 

Pseudo-Certification Marks

Alexandra Mogyoros 

Session 6. Interfaces with Big Data and AI

Chair: Christophe Geiger 

AI + IP

 Edward Lee 

Challenges of Artificial Intelligence to Patent Law & Copyright Law and Countermeasures

Xiang Yu 

To Monopolize or not to Monopolize: IP in the Age of Data

Margaret-Ann Wilkinson 

IP and Data Protection – Convergence or Divergence

 Ole-Andreas Rognstad 

AI Patents and the Self-Assembling Machine

 Dan Burk 

The New Big Data Protection Mechanism in Japan: Helpful, Harmful, or not that Big (a deal) After All?

Christoph W. Rademacher 

Session 7A. EU and US Copyright: In Turmoil?

Chair: Barbara Lauriat 

Rebus sic Stantibus of Renegotiating Royalties à la polonaise. A Clash or Symbiosis with Civil Law

Lavinia Brancusi 

Between Svensson and Renckhoff: EU Communication to the Public in Disarray?

Bukola Faturoti 

Hyperlinking to Copyright Works in EU: Finding a Weak Link

Ivana Kunda 

How Fundamental Rights Shape EU Copyright Law: An Empirical Analysis

 João Pedro Quintais & Bernd Justin Jutte 

On the Adequacy of an Essential Function Doctrine in Copyright Law

Giulia Priora 

Session 7B. Focus on Pharma

Chair: Ida Madeiha 

Data Exclusivity and Patents – Interrelations, Overlaps and Consequences of Their Coexistence

Żaneta Pacud 

Doctrine of Sound Prediction – A Possible Tool to Support Patenting Black Box Algorithms for Personalized Medicine?

Helen Yu 

The Patentability of Genetic Therapies: CAR-T and the Medical Treatment Exclusion around the World

Jorge L. Contreras & Luis Gil Abinader 

South Africa’s Bayh Dole Equivalent – Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Funded Research and Development Act, Act no.51 of 2008

Nyatlo Mavis 

The Interface between Patents and Competition Policy in the Pharmaceutical Sector: Implications for Access to Medicines

Duncan Matthews 

Session 7C. National Approaches

Chair: Martin Senftleben 

Innovation through Judicial Specialization

Sapna Kumar 

Modernization of trademark legislation in Mexico

 Guillermo Martínez Cons 

Pre-1972 Sound Recordings: Noncommercial Uses in Law and Practice

Elizabeth Townsend Gard 

The Balance of Primary and Secondary Rights in Russian IP Law

Ivan Zenin 

Copyright (As Constitutional Property) Materials and the Prot’n of the Right to Basic Education in S. Africa: Deprivation or Expropriation?

 Enyinna Nwauche 

Design: Lessons from a Comparative Law Analysis

Shubha Ghosh 

Machine-Learning Technologies: (Dis)Empowering Digital Citizens?

César Ramírez-Montes 

Session 8. Copyright: ‘Out of the Box’

 Chair: Raquel Xalabarder 

From Technology to Economic Right(s) in Copyright: a (Musical) Review

Eva Laskowska-Litak 

Expanding Authors’ reversion rights as a response to copyright term extensions

Paul J. Heald 

Adding Remix Right as a Secondary Copyright

 Yahong Li 

Copyright Exceptions and Limitations for Legal Deposit: Should there be More Consistency?

Susan Corbett 

The Derivative Right: Lessons from the Film Industry

 Joseph Fishman 

An Appraisal of Copyright as Tool to Accommodate Digitized Heritage in the Dynamic of Cultural Creative Industries

Caroline Joelle Nwabueze 

Commenter

Bernt Hugenholtz 

Essay Competition

Chair: Jan Rosen

Presentation by Or Cohen-Sasson, Winner, 2018 ATRIP Essay Contest, “A Hidden Technological Assumption in Patent Law: The Case of Gene Patents and the Disclosure Requirement</I (presentation sponsored by FICPI)

Day 3,

Wednesday 28 August

Session 9. Big Bang

Chair: Joseph Fishman 

Looking at Copyright and Related Rights From Outside – Consistency of Protections through a Public Domain Principle

Séverine Dussollier 

Defining Intellectual Property as an Investment

Emmanuel Oke 

Communications Law and Copyright Law: Toward Greater Legal Convergence in the Digital Domain

Stuart N. Brotman 

Developing a Creator-Centric Approach to Copyright in the Age of Online Platforms

Giuseppe Mazziotti 

Intelligent Design or Natural Selection?” The Contested Future of Intellectual Property Law

Alexandra George 

For a Systemically Appropriate and Pro-competitive Reconstruction of the Relationship between IP and Unfair Competition Law

Gustavo Ghidini 

Education and Methodology Panel: The Role of Libraries and Repositories in IP Education and Research

For a Systemically Appropriate and Pro-competitive Reconstruction of the Relationship between IP and Unfair Competition Law

 Chair: Susy Frankel Meredith Ashley Capps Rebecca Giblin Paul J. Heald Margaret-Ann Wilkinson Martin Senftleben