2018-05-08 | The ATRIP 2018 Congress – Helsinki

PROGRAMME DETAILS

Dates: 05–08 August 2018 President: Prof. Daniel Gervais

Programme: Download PDF

Host: Hanken School of Economics and IPR University Center Links:

Focus: Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property

Message from the President

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

After New Zealand and the Southern Hemisphere, we convened in Helsinki, closer to the other Pole, thus reflecting the quest for balance in ATRIP congresses.

The 37th Annual Congress explored the role of fairness, morality and ordre public in Intellectual Property (IP) law and policy. Those “big notions” in law that cut across IP as they do other fields of law. They vary by jurisdiction but in each jurisdiction they can cut a swath across multiple legal disciplines and policy areas. Those “big concepts” are useful in a number of ways because IP is a set of rules and principles embedded in a broad network of social norms, societal concerns and linkages with other key public policy areas: Innovation, economic growth, the development of individual potential, access to culture and medicines, dealing with climate change , maintaining a vibrant online environment, these are only some of the aspects that emerge in IP-related discussions.

Daniel Gervais, PhD, MAE
ATRIP President

PHOTOS FROM THE EVENT: Click Here

Highlights

ATRIP2018

Read the Full Programme

Early Career Workshop, Sunday 5 August

Morality in International IP Lawmaking

Katharina Behrend (UK)

Fair’s Fair? The Role of ‘Fairness’ in Shaping Copyright Law’s Library Privilege from a Library Perspective

V.E. Breemen (Netherlands)

Incentives and Regulation for New Health Technologies

Dhanay Cadillo Chandler (Finland)

Towards a European “Fair Use” Grounded in Freedom of Expression

Elena Izyumenko (France)
(with Prof. Ch. Geiger)

Interpretation and Application of Rights and Exceptions in EU Copyright Law: a Fair Balance?

Daniël Jongsma (Finland)

Excessive Pharmaceutical Prices as an Anticompetitive Practice under TRIPS

Behrang Kianzad (Denmark)

Data Localisation Barriers to International Digital Trade

Nikita Melashchenko (New Zealand)

Practicability and Significance of Human Dignity in International Patent Law: a Comparison of European and U.S. Patent Law

Stefan Papastefanou (Germany)

Consumption of Digital Works – a Legal Analysis of EU Copyright Law within the Framework of Lawful Acquisition and Exploitation of Protected Content

Kacper Szkalej (Sweden)

The Necessity of “Basic Structure Doctrine”

Pratyush Nath Upreti (France)

(Re)Quest of a New Why? Re-Visiting the Policy Debate and the Rationale for IP law

Anna Aurora Wennäkoski (Finland)

Is Protection Against Free Riders and Market Abuse ‘Fair’ in Trade Mark Law Practice? A Human Rights Perspective

Genevieve Wilkinson (Australia)

“General Clause” of Fair Use in the Third Amendment of the Copyright Law of China

Lei Yi (Germany)

Day 1,

Monday 6 August

Session 1. Measuring and Defining Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in IP Law

Chair: Graeme Dinwoodie, Chicago-Kent College of Law, USA (Past ATRIP President (2011-2013))

Developing a Tool for Defining and Measuring Fairness and Morality in Intellectual Property Rights

Marsha Simone Cadogan, Centre for International Governance Innovation CIGI, Canada

International Public Order & Intellectual Property

Nicolas Binctin, Université de Poitiers, France

The Three -Step Test and Fairness in IP Law: Where Are We Ten Years after the Declaration?

Jonathan Griffiths, Queen Mary School of Law, UK

Measuring International Standards of Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Terms of Development Objectives

Susan Isiko Štrba, University of the Witwaterstrand, South Africa

A Global Norm for Fairness and Morality in IP Law: an Unattainable Goal?

Yahong Li, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Session 2. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Authors?

Chair: Sam Ricketson, University of Melbourne, Australia

Fairness and Authors’ Reversion Rights

Paul J. Heald, University of Illinois College of Law, USA

Graffiti, Street Art, and the Purpose of Copyright Law

Pascale Chapdelaine, University of Windsor, Canada

Fairness Towards Authors: Does It Necessarily Mean Caring for the Weak?

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Fairness in Visual Arts

Anette Alén-Savikko, University of Helsinki, Finland (speaker/presenter) &
Rosa Maria Ballardini, University of Lapland, Finland (co-author of the final research paper)

Bad Bargains by Authors and Performers: What’s Fair, and Who Cares?

Mary LaFrance, University of Nevada, USA

Fairness vs. Welfare in the Discussion of Copyright Laws and Policies: Royalties for the Resale of Artworks

Antoni Rubí-Puig, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

Session 3A. Gender, Identity and IP in a Networked Environment

Chair: Barbara Lauriat, King’s College London, UK

Pornography, Privacy, Copyright Law and Consent

Ann Bartow, University of New Hampshire, USA

Internet Censorship: Copyright and Ordre Public

Hong Xue, Beijing Normal University, China

Can IP Law Protect People from Harassment?

Edward Lee, Chicago-Kent College of Law, USA

Surname as Trademark – “Selling” Your Identity in the Fashion Area

Joanna Buchalska, Kozminski University, Poland

Session 3B. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Groundbreaking Technologies?

Chair: Jens Schovsbo, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (ATRIP President-elect)

Use and Abuse of Databases Rights in the Data Era: Looking for a Consistent Approach

Valeria Falce & Valerio Torti, Università Europea di Roma, Italy

Inventions Generated by Artificial Intelligence: Patent Protection & Moral Connotations

Luz Sánchez, UCAM University, Spain

The ‘Notion of Fairness’ in Intellectual Property Law and the Digitization of Data

Helen Yu, Sciences Po Paris, France

The Future of Blockchain Technology and Collective Management Organizations: Copyright Enforcement Solved?

Dinusha Mendis, Bournemouth University, UK

Fake News as an IP Problem

Dana Beldiman, Bucerius Law School, Germany and UC Hastings Law School, USA Arpan Banerjee, Jindal Global Law School, India and University of New South Wales, Australia

Dynamic Patent Economic Value beyond Challenging of Emerging Technologies: 3D Printing

Chung-Lun Shen, National Chengchi University, Taiwan

Session 3C. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in IP: National and Regional Approaches

Chair: Christian LeStanc, Université de Montpellier, France

Flexibility and Legal Certainty in EU Copyright Law: Towards an EU-Tailored Fair Use Standard

Tito Rendas, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal

Study on the Application of the General Clause of Anti-Unfair Competition Law in China

Qian Tao, China University of Political Science and Law, China

Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property: Harmony and Dissonance (The Russian Experience)

Ivan A. Zenin, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

Fairness on the Home Front: ‘Anzac’ as Trade Mark, 1915 –

Catherine Bond, UNSW Sydney, Australia

Session 4. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Indigenous Peoples?

Chair: Peter Yu, Texas A&M University, USA

Fairness, Justice and Databases for Indigenous Knowledge and Culture

Natalie Stoianoff, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

Human Rights Principles as Normative Tools for the Assessment of Fairness in the Context of Indigenous Peoples’ Heritage

Josephine (Kelly) Breemen, Tilburg University & University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Intangible Cultural Heritage Data Flows and Intellectual Property Regulation: Mitigating Fairness and Morality

C. Joelle Nwabueze, University of South Africa, South Africa

Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Fairness: Rethinking Recognition and Rewards Arising from Intellectual Endeavor of Indigenous Communities

Bassem Awad and Oluwatobiloba Moody, Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Canada

Reception at the University of Helsinki.

Day 2,

Tuesday 7 August

Session 5. Economic and Non-Economic Shades of Fairness and Morality

Chair: Justin Hughes, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, USA

Developing a Tool for Defining and Measuring Fairness and Fairness, Markets, and Intellectual Property

Shubha Ghosh, Syracuse University College of Law, USA

Incentive-based Justification for ’Fairness’: Antitrust vs. Intellectual Property

Juha Vesala, University of Helsinki, Finland

Fair vs. Optimal Use of Intellectual Property: an Economic Perspective

Yasser Gadallah, Helwan University, Egypt

The Well-Being Approach to IP – a More ‘Moral’ Approach?

Estelle Derclaye and Tim Taylor, University of Nottingham, UK

Fifty Shades of Fairness: a Return to General Principles to Draw and Rationalize the Borders of Copyright

Caterina Sganga, Central European University, Hungary

GIs, Colonised Countries and Trade Agreements: (Un)Fair Use versus Economic Interests

Suelen Carls, University of Marília, Brazil

Are Non-Discrimination Principles Fair?

Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, University of Cambridge, UK

Session 6. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Access to Copyright Works?

Chair: Christophe Geiger, CEIPI, University of Strasbourg, France

Access to Textbooks in Schools in Developing Countries, Copyright, and the Right to Education

Klaus D. Beiter, North-West University, South Africa

Reflecting the Dynamism of ‘Fairness’ in Copyright Law: a Users’ Rights Perspective

Poorna Mysoor, University of Oxford, UK

Transforming Copyright: Fair Use in the Digital World

Glynn Lunney, Texas A&M University, USA

Reconstructing Fairness in Copyright Exemptions

Maurizio Borghi, Bournemouth University, UK

The Fairness of Digital Second-Hand Marketplaces and the Future of the Doctrine of Exhaustion

Péter Mezei, University of Szeged, Hungary

Copyright Law Reform and Censorship in Iran: Whose Morality?

Lida Ayoubi, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand

Session 7A. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Employees in Global Production Chains?

Chair: Anna Tischner, Jagielloński University, Poland

Intellectual Property Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility

Janice Denoncourt, Nottingham Trent University, UK

Fairness and the Right to Employee Inventions

Niklas Bruun, IPR University Center, Finland

Using Fairness to Determine Post-Employment Duties with Respect to Trade Secrets

Magdalena Kolasa, formerly Ludwig Maximilians University Munich and Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Germany

The Offence to Religious Beliefs: Comparing Protection Systems, Copyright Law vs. Industrial Law

Maria Letizia Bixio, European University of Rome, Italy

Fairness in Certified Global Food Chains

Katja Lindroos, University of Eastern Finland, Finland

Session 7B. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean for Confidential Information?

Chair: Niva Elkin-Koren, University of Haifa, Israel

Strategic and Defensive Patenting

Emanuela Arezzo, University of Teramo, School of Law, Italy

Unfair Commercial Use of Regulatory Pharmaceutical Data

Żaneta Pacud, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Honest Commercial Practices in Unfair Competition and Confidential Information Law

Zoi Michalopoulou, Bucerius Law School, Germany

Trade Secrets vs. Freedom of Expression and Whistleblowing

Ulla-Maija Mylly, University of Turku, Finland, and Sharon K. Sandeen, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, USA

Session 7C. Fairness and Morality: The Role of Negotiation or Remedial Measures

Chair: Gustavo Ghidini, LUISS University, Rome, Italy (Past ATRIP President (2005-2007))

Royalty Rebates and Competition: the Qualcomm Ruling and the Intel Decision

Andy C. M. Chen, Yuan Christian University, Taiwan

Remedies and Fairness in Intellectual Property Law

Orit Fischman-Afori, College of Management Academic Studies, Israel

The Meaning of ‘’Fair and Reasonable” in the Context of FRAND Commitments

Rafał Sikorski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland

Fair and Equitable Treatment of Foreign Investments and Intellectual Property Rights

Emmanuel Oke, University of Edinburgh, UK

Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing in the Indo-Pacific

Evana Wright, University of Technology Sydney, Australia

A Restitution Model for Intellectual Property Remedies

John M. Golden, The University of Texas at Austin, USA & Karen E. Sandrik, Willamette University College of Law, USA

Session 8. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean in Trademark Law?

Chair: Martin Senftleben, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Dissonance within Harmonization of the EU IP Rules of Ordre Public and Morality – Lessons from Design and Trademark Law

Lavinia Brancusi, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Poland

Fairness and Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights: Is It All about Requirements?

Milton Lucídio Leão Barcellos, Antonio Meneghetti Law School, Brazil

An Inter-Disciplinary Analysis of THE SLANTS Case

Vicki T. Huang, Deakin University, Australia

Ordre Public in Chinese Trademark Law: Recent Cases

Xiuqin Lin, Xiamen University, China

The Unfairness of Overlapping Rights: The Case Against Trademark and Copyright Protection Overlaps

Irene Calboli, Texas A&M University, USA

Post-sale Confusion, Parasitic Competition and the Boundaries of Imitation Freedom of the External Appearance of a Product

Marek Salamonowicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland

Gala Dinner at Restaurant Sipuli.

Day 3,

Wednesday 8 August

Session 9. Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public: What Does it Mean in Patent Law?

Chair: Taina Pihlajarinne, University of Helsinki, Finland

Moral Exclusions on Patents: in Search of Foundations

Aurora Plomer, University of Bristol Law School, UK

Patent Policy in the Age of Nationalism

Sapna Kumar, University of Houston Law Center, USA

Ordre Public and Morality Exclusions from Patentability in a Developing Muslim Country: Pakistan

Saad Nusrullah, Punjab University Law College, Pakistan

Patents, Morality and Biosciences Innovation

Ana Nordberg, Lund University, Sweden

Wither Fairness: Pricing Issues In The Pharmaceutical Industry

Vidya Kumari, Hyderabad University, India

Fairness, Patents and Plausibility

Pamela Lönnqvist, University of Helsinki, Finland

Compulsory Licensing of Patented Pharmaceuticals Using the Marrakesh Model

Jerome H. Reichman, Duke University, USA

Towards a fair Intellectual Property Framework for Open Science

Juan Fernando Cordoba Marentes, Universidad de La Sabana, Colombia

Session 10. Panel Discussion: Education and Methodology

Chair: Niklas Bruun, IPR University Center, Finland

Panelists:
– Sherif Saadallah, World Intellecutal property Organizaton (WIPO) Academy
– Orit Fischman-Afori, College of Management Academic Studies, Israel
– Graeme Dinwoodie, Chicago-Kent College of Law, USA
– Jeremy de Beer, University of Ottawa, Canada

ATRIP Essay Competition

Chair: Jan Rosén, Stockholm University, Sweden (past ATRIP President (2009-2011))